June 3rd, 2013

I would congratulate Xira on being more of a gentleman than her other guyfriends but that's not setting the bar very high.

Vote for Runewriters and get an extra doodle! :"D This one checks in on Severian.




Vote Incentive for This Comic.

Comment by Karen

Also 'trigger-happy' seems like an odd sort of term to use in a place that (as far as we've seen so far) has no guns... o_o And yet I can't think of a comparable phrase that would work. I guess it comes down to the "Call a smerp a rabbit" kind of thing again?

Reply

posted at 8:41am on June 3rd, 2013

Reply by Rachel

It could be? But the word trigger dates back to the 1600s or earlier, really. "Trigger-happy" doesn't show up allegedly till the 30s and 40s, but even so...

I mean, crossbows have triggers as well. It isn't impossible for a medieval-esque society like Varænske's to have the word and later develop the idea of "a person who is quick to fire [a crossbow] is happy to use the trigger" and distilling it to that phrase the same as we did.

#in which rachel over-analyzes words

Reply

posted at 12:28pm on June 3rd, 2013

Reply by Karen

I hadn't considered crossbows! Okay, I feel satisfied :) Thank you for your excellent overanalyzation.

Reply

posted at 1:39pm on June 3rd, 2013

Reply by Asterai

Crossbows aside, it is hard to come up with a close equivalent for trigger-happy. Bloodthirsty is a relation, but doesn't conjure the same image of dangerous jumpiness. Uuuuhhhh... quick to kill? Quick to blame? Aggressive is a good fallback, but doesn't flow the same, doesn't sound like casual conversation.

Reply

posted at 3:32pm on June 3rd, 2013

Reply by Rachel

Hm, that's a good point. I'd start leaning toward "bloodlust" types of words, to hit the "eagerly belligerent" feel that trigger-happy has, but bloodlust is also not very good for trying to sound conversational.

Which is where I *personally* think the criticism breaks down. To me anachronistic language isn't inherently suspension-of-disbelief-breaking, so I tend to gloss over the issue of "would they have reason to use this word" and focus more on "did this say what it was supposed to say in a way that was efficient and sounded natural?"

Not everyone is me, though, so I get that for some people it DOES break suspension of disbelief, and that's not like, BAD. ;u;

Reply

posted at 3:42pm on June 3rd, 2013

Reply by szukam spawacza

Comment is awaiting moderation.

posted at 11:06am on July 16th, 2023

Reply by Shazzbaa

There've been a few modern words leaked into the RW-folks' diction (medieval people didn't really get a lot of mileage out of "holy crap" either xD ) -- I have my own explanations, but it's a background thing so I think I'll save them for later. :") MIGHT MAKE A GOOD VOTE INCENTIVE SOME DAY

(As an aside, if world-reasons had prevented me from using "trigger-happy" I would've gone with "overzealous." It loses the specific visual of being quick to fire, but it keeps the feeling of the hunters being way too excited to carry out their duty of murdering aberrants.)

Reply

posted at 5:15pm on June 3rd, 2013

<< Return to Comments



Refresh Captcha
If you can see this text and text box, please leave the field empty.